Users
A total of 923 people responded to the new COBADI dos.0 survey (Dining table step 1). The fresh new take to comprised generally of females (81.2%), more youthful (average many years = (5.2), minute. = 17, maximum. = 50), and in its first 12 months in the school (50.2%). Bayesian inference allows us to analyze inequitable trials regarding gender because it allows the addition of the fresh study getting coding later. The fresh new questionnaire are put digitally to students discovering Personal Education and you can Societal Performs (Universidad Pablo de- Olavide) and you may Pedagogy (UNED) inside academic years and you can . There had been zero limitations to your participation, without financial or academic extra is actually open to take part within analysis.
Show
With the George and Mallery (2003) classification, we found that the questionnaire had a high degree of overall reliability (? Cronbach = .83 (.81–.85) https://getbride.org/bosnian-naiset/, Guttman’s ?6 = .86). We also found a high degree of reliability in the subscale “Competences in the use of ICT for the search and treatment of information” (? Cronbach = .85 (.85–.89), Guttman’s ?6 = .87), moderate reliability in the subscale “Interpersonal competences in the use of ICT at university” (not considering items based on a preference scale, ? Cronbach = .65 (.58–.7), ?6 Guttman’s ?6 = .59), and moderate reliability in the scale “Virtual and social communication tools at university” (? Cronbach = .62 (.56–.68), Guttman’s ?6 = .51). The general descriptive results show (Table 3) that the vast majority of students have access to an Internet connection (98.2%). The time spent on the Internet is distributed among the following activities: university work (68.3%), use of social networks (63.9%) and listening to music (53.3%). It is significant that 77.8% stated that they never use Internet for gaming online, and 50.1% never use it to make new friends.
Throughout the outcomes for “Competences in the usage of ICT towards search and you can treatment of information”, we remember that both female and male students getting they have a great quantity of ability from the access to “se’s”, “browsers”, “electronic cartography” and “podcasting”. The tools they use having quicker warranty is actually “QR requirements” and also the production of “on line demonstrations”. Gender differences are noticeable on accessibility “digital cartography”, having good Bayes foundation out of , and that reveals that the information try moments prone to are available from the theory that claims there is certainly a distinction anywhere between men and you can feminine youngsters compared to this new theory of equal competence anywhere between the latest sexes. This shows which is quite strong otherwise decisive facts for the go for from a distinction ranging from women and men, which have a measurements of effect of .34 (.17, .51). Ergo, discover evidence that male students features deeper seen skills from inside the digital cartography versus female people. Which effect is actually suffered to the inclusion out-of a prior shipments that have an roentgen parameter of 1.5 (Bayes foundation = , quite strong or definitive facts). With respect to skills when you look at the “on line demonstrations”, the outcomes show a beneficial Bayes grounds out-of seven.29, hence demonstrates the details was seven.31 minutes expected to appear in the new hypothesis that there try a change anywhere between male and female children than in the fresh hypothesis of equal competence amongst the sexes. This indicates there is confident or big proof of a great difference in a man and you will women people, with a size of effect of .twenty-eight (.10, .45). For this reason, discover research that dudes features better recognized ability within the development “on the web presentations” than the women. That it perception is actually suffered when together with a past shipments having a keen r parameter of just one.5 (Bayes grounds = 5.36), due to the fact revealed in the Fig. step one.