Suggestions, apply at, and applicant sex in You

Suggestions, apply at, and applicant sex in You

101 . Newhagen , John Age. , “Beyond worry about-report: Playing with latency to answer design the question answering techniques to your web-depending public-opinion surveys,” from the Sourcebook for Political Interaction Browse , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you will Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Yahoo College student

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Political perceptions vary having emotional faculties,” Research , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Is women more likely to vote getting ladies factors debts than just its men acquaintances?” Legislative Studies Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Student

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Women Build: The policy Effect of women into the Congress ( Chi town : School from Chi town Drive , 2002 ).Bing Beginner

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and Hurley , Patricia A good. , “A symbol speeches about U.S. Senate in addition to their representational implications,” Diary away from Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is blacks represent blacks and you may feminine show female? A Upoznavanje na mreЕѕi vs stvarni Еѕivot good contingent ‘yes’,” Diary of Politics 1999 , 61 ( 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle College student

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated political training in addition to detailed symbolization of females,” Political Decisions 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Can there be an effective ‘gender attraction effect’ from inside the American government? S. Family elections,” Political Look Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This short article could have been quoted by the after the products. This list is done according to research available with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A beneficial. and you may Lust, Ellen 2015. Would it be Gender, Religiosity or Each other? A role Congruity Principle out-of Applicant Electability in Transitional Tunisia. Point of views to your Politics, Vol. 13, Situation. step 1, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole M. 2015. Whom stereotypes women individuals? Pinpointing personal variations in women label dependence. Government, Communities, and you will Identities, Vol. step three, Issue. step one, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “This new role out-of gender within the descriptive signal,” Political Search Quarterly 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Young Mie Knisely, Sandra and you can McLeod, Douglas 2015. When women attack. Government and Lifetime Sciences, Vol. 34, Point. 1, p. 49.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you can Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving mixed signals: the latest role from gender and you can partisanship in the evaluations away from people in politics. Diary off Elections, Public opinion and you will Events, Vol. twenty six, Question. cuatro, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and you may Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. That have Cardiovascular system and you will (No) Notice? Just how Users Negatively Infer Shed Information regarding Politicians as well as how Which Affects this new Assessment of Speakermunication Search, Vol. 43, Question. eight, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Deciding Perceptions off Female Politicians: The case away from Poland. Government during the Main Europe, Vol. 14, Situation. 3, p. eight.

Schneider, Monica C. and you can Bos, Angela L. 2019. The effective use of Public Role Concept toward Examination of Gender for the Government. Governmental Mindset, Vol. 40, Matter. S1, p. 173.

Playground, Sunlight Younger and you may Baek, Young Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence with the Feminine Politicians: As to why Ambivalence Issues for Gender Equivalence into the an excellent Democracy. Diary of females, Politics & Rules, Vol. 40, Material. dos, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Reputation Murder and you will Ladies in Politics. Corvinus Record out of Worldwide Products, Vol. 4, Point. step 1, p. 15.

Aaldering, Loes and you can Van Der Jamais, Daphne Joanna 2020. Governmental Management regarding Media: Gender Prejudice in the Chief Stereotypes during the Venture and you may Regimen Minutes. Uk Log away from Political Research, Vol. fifty, Issue. step 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how do Citizens Assess Highway?Level Bureaucrats’ Enthusiasm and you can Ability? An effective Typology and you will Test. Public Administration Feedback, Vol. 80, Thing. 4, p. 532.

답글 남기기

이메일 주소를 발행하지 않을 것입니다. 필수 항목은 *(으)로 표시합니다